The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the alleged implausibility of the undercover officer's account of the transaction, were properly considered by the trier of facts and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations.
Defendant's claim concerning the closure of the courtroom during the undercover officer's testimony is similar to a claim rejected by this Court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
