AARON v. MATTIKOW

No. 99-CV-2662 (DRH).

146 F.Supp.2d 263 (2001)

Philip Irwin AARON, Plaintiff, v. Alfred E. MATTIKOW, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

June 8, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry R. Carus, P.C., Syosset, NY by Edward Rugino, for plaintiff.

Alfred H. Mattikow, Greenwich, CT, pro se.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HURLEY, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the motion of plaintiff Philip Aaron ("plaintiff") for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff commenced this action to enforce and recover upon a promissory note. (Compl.¶¶ 5-7.) The promissory note, which was executed on June...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases