PATEL v. CONTEMPORARY CLASSICS OF BEV. HILLS

Nos. 98-9459(L), 99-7489(CON).

259 F.3d 123 (2001)

Kanti A. Patel, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Contemporary Classics of Beverly Hills and Herbert Schachter, Defendants, Alan Neadle, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. August Term, 2000.

Decided: August 3, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

SANATKUMAR V. PANDIT, W. Hartford, CT, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

STEPHEN McELENY, McEleny & McGrail, Hartford, CT, (Albert J. McGrail, on the brief) for Defendant-Appellee, Alan Neadle.

WILLIAM J. DOYLE, Wiggin & Dana, New Haven, CT, for Defendants Contemporary Classics of Beverly Hills and Herbert Schachter.

Before: McLAUGHLIN, POOLER, and KOELTL, .


McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge

"What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet." William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, act 2, sc. 2.

In this appeal, we review the decision of the district court to consider a motion expressly made under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss despite the fact (according to the plaintiff) that the defendant had already filed a valid answer. Regardless of whether the pleadings were, in fact, closed-a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases