1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 288 A.D.2d
  5. 288 A.D.2d 86 (2001)
 

HAMILTON v. HUNT

288 A.D.2d 86 (2001)

733 N.Y.S.2d 153

CHERYL HAMILTON et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiff, v. JOY L. HUNT et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided November 15, 2001.

The deposition testimony on which appellants rely is inconsistent in material respects, and insufficient to rebut the presumption of permissive use created by Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 (1) (see, MVAIC v Levinson, 218 A.D.2d 606, 607). Troy and Joy testified that they were both in their apartment during the late evening preceding the early morning of the accident, watching TV, yet they failed to see one another. According...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases