The court's finding was not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant's accessorial liability could be readily inferred from the totality of the evidence, including appellant's post-arrest statements. Appellant, with admitted prior knowledge of the impending commission of the crime, took a position blocking any possible flight by the victim and also engaged in lookout-like behavior (see, Matter of Taalib B.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF LOUIS V.
288 A.D.2d 38 (2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 221
In the Matter of LOUIS V., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 8, 2001.
Decided November 8, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.