CITY OF NY v. STATE DHCR


97 N.Y.2d 216 (2001)

765 N.E.2d 829

739 N.Y.S.2d 333

CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL, Respondent. RENT STABILIZATION ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY ET AL., Intervenors-Appellants; MET COUNCIL ON HOUSING ET AL., Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 20, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler, Schwartz & Nahins, P. C., New York City (Jeffrey R. Metz of counsel), for intervenors-appellants.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel of New York City, Brooklyn (Dona B. Morris, Francis F. Caputo, Deborah Rand and Spencer Fisher of counsel), for respondent.

Collins, Dobkin & Miller, L. L. P., New York City (Stephen Dobkin of counsel), for intervenors-respondents.

Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY concur with Chief Judge KAYE; Judge ROSENBLATT dissents and votes to reverse in a separate opinion; Judge GRAFFEO taking no part.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge KAYE.

The formula for the maximum base rent (MBR) for rent-controlled New York City apartments ensures landlords an 8.5% return on capital value, defined as equalized assessed valuation under the Real Property Tax Law. That State statute provides two possibly applicable measures of equalized assessed valuation, article 12-A—which was formerly used—and article...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases