PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's ruling denying Mr. Haines's motion for postconviction relief. We comment only to clarify that the amended order, which was filed after Mr. Haines filed his notice of appeal, was entered without jurisdiction and was therefore a nullity.
Mr. Haines sought to withdraw his 1998 plea, claiming that it was involuntarily entered. The trial court's first order is supported by competent, substantial evidence. However, while Mr...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.