1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 754 N.E.2d
  5. 754 N.E.2d 896 (2001)
 

BUCKALEW v. BUCKALEW

No. 34S05-0107-CV-332.

754 N.E.2d 896 (2001)

Kim BUCKALEW, Respondent-Appellant, v. Tim BUCKALEW, Petitioner-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

September 7, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan J. May, Kokomo, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant.

Andrew J. Vandenbosch, Raquet & Vandenbosch, Donald E.C. Leicht, Kokomo, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellee.

Howard County Bar Association, William C. Menges, Jr., Kokomo, Indiana, amicus curiae.

DICKSON, Justice

Concluding that a local court rule requiring the filing of an income and property disclosure form was jurisdictional, the Court of Appeals held a dissolution decree was void due to the trial court's failure to follow its own rule. Buckalew v. Buckalew, 744 N.E.2d 504 (Ind.Ct.App.2001). Having previously granted transfer, we hold that the local rule was not jurisdictional, and we reject the claim that noncompliance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases