1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 268 F.3d
  5. 268 F.3d 1342 (2001)
 

EMI GROUP NORTH AMERICA v. CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR

No. 00-1508.

268 F.3d 1342 (2001)

EMI GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: September 21, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Bradley, Sidley & Austin, of Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Kathi A. Cover and William D. McSpadden. Of counsel were Ivan S. Kavrukov, Cooper & Dunham LLP, of New York, NY; and Donald F. Parsons, Jr., Morris, Nichols, Arsht and Tunnell, of Wilmington, DE.

C. Randall Bain, Brown & Bain, P.A., of Phoenix, AZ, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were C. Mark Kittredge and Roger A. Denning.

Before RADER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

After a jury verdict, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware denied EMI Group North America, Inc.'s motion for a new trial. EMI Group N. Am., Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corp., 104 F.Supp.2d 370 (D.Del.2000). Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the jury verdicts were consistent, this court affirms.

EMI also sought a judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases