1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 258 F.3d
  5. 258 F.3d 1317 (2001)
 

DAYCO PRODUCTS, INC. v. TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC.

No. 00-1503.

258 F.3d 1317 (2001)

DAYCO PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied August 24, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Constance S. Huttner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Daniel A. DeVito. Of counsel was Joel K. Goldman, Husch & Eppenberger, of Kansas City, Missouri.

Randolph J. Huis, Volpe and Koenig, P.C., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for defendant-appellee.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, LINN, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied August 24, 2001.

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Dayco Products, Inc. ("Dayco") appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri granting the motion of Total Containment, Inc. ("TCI") for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,129,686 (the "`686 patent"), 5,199,752 (the "`752 patent"), 5,297,822 (the "`822 patent"), 5,380,050 (the "`050 patent"), and 5,486,023...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases