1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 783 A.2d
  5. 783 A.2d 756 (2001)
 

GILLES v. WILEY, MALEHORN & SIROTA

783 A.2d 756 (2001)

345 N.J. Super. 119

Denise GILLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILEY, MALEHORN & SIROTA, Arthur L. Raynes, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 14, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Evan L. Goldman, Metuchen, argued the cause for appellant (Frizell Goldman Jaffe & Samuels, attorneys; Mr. Goldman, of counsel and on the brief).

Meredith Kaplan Stoma, Livingston, argued the cause for respondents (Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, attorneys; Ms. Stoma, of counsel; Elise Dinolfo, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, WEFING and LESEMANN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Denise Gilles appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her legal malpractice complaint against defendants, the law firm of Wiley, Malehorn & Sirota, and its partner, Arthur L. Raynes, who had represented her. The gravamen of her complaint is that Raynes, voluntarily and without good cause attributable to her, terminated the representation without adequately protecting her against the running...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases