1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 239 F.3d
  5. 239 F.3d 1277 (2001)
 

UROPLASTY, INC. v. ADVANCED UROSCIENCE

No. 00-1185

239 F.3d 1277 (2001)

Uroplasty, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Advanced Uroscience, Inc., Brennen Medical, Inc., and Timothy Lawin, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED February 8, 2001

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles H. De La Garza, Fulbright & Jaworski, of Austin, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was H. Melissa Mather.

Robert D. Maher, Best & Flanagan LLP, of Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Charles L. Gholz, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., of Arlington, Virginia, argued for defendants-appellees. With them on the brief was Caryn S. Glover, Best & Flanagan LLP, of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, MICHEL and DYK, Circuit Judges.

MAYER, Chief Judge.

Uroplasty, Inc. (Uroplasty) appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota granting summary judgment that Advanced Uroscience, Inc., Brennen Medical, Inc., and Timothy Lawin (collectively, UroScience) did not misappropriate Uroplasty's trade secrets and did not breach contracts with or fiduciary duties to Uroplasty. See Uroplasty, Inc. v. Advanced UroScience, Inc., No. 98-2082 (D.Minn. Nov. 5, 1999...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases