STOUT v. AMCO INS. CO.

No. CX-01-246.

632 N.W.2d 762 (2001)

Jason J. STOUT, Respondent, v. AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, Andrew Pangrac, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 21, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven R. Peloquin, Peloquin & Minge, P.A., New York Mills, for respondent.

George C. Hottinger, Erstad & Riemer, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge, and HALBROOKS and LINDBERG, Judges.


OPINION

LINDBERG, Judge.*

Appellant AMCO Insurance Company contends that the district court erred in finding it liable for the full amount of respondent's medical expenses instead of the reduced amount that respondent's medical providers accepted based on their contractual agreements with Medica Choice (through MinnesotaCare) and Medicaid. Appellant also contends that the district court erroneously calculated the statutory interest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases