PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant's response to the Court's order of July 16, 2001, the Court has determined that it does not have jurisdiction. Because the appellant's motion for rehearing was not authorized, rendition of the underlying order was not delayed. See Griffis v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.