Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea allocution was factually insufficient to establish a sale of the controlled substance (see, People v Crooks,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.