Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a nonjury trial of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05) and other offenses. The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Defendant contends in his pro se supplemental brief that the conviction of robbery in the third degree is not supported by legally sufficient evidence because the People failed to establish that he intended to steal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
