U.S. v. DICO, INC.

No. 00-2430.

266 F.3d 864 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DICO, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: September 19, 2001.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied: November 27, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley A. Reigel, Kansas City, MO, argued (Mark E. Johnson and Alexander B. Robb, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for appellant.

Katherine J. Barton, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued (Lois J. Schiffer, Asst. Attorney General, John T. Stahr, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. and Daniel Shiel, U.S. EPA, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for appellee.

Before BOWMAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL, District Judge.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied: November 27, 2001.*

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The United States sued Dico, Inc., pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675 (1994 & Supp. IV 1998), to recover response costs incurred for the cleanup of groundwater contaminated by trichloroethylene (TCE)2 and other chlorinated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases