1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 91 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 91 Cal.Rptr.2d 881 (2000)
 

LECTRODRYER v. SEOULBANK

No. B125737.

91 Cal.Rptr.2d 881 (2000)

77 Cal.App.4th 723

LECTRODRYER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SEOULBANK, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

Review Denied May 17, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sullivan & Cromwell, Michael H. Steinberg and Daniel E. Sobelsohn, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lee & Hong and David C. Degerman, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

BOREN, P.J.

Lectrodryer sued SeoulBank for unjust enrichment arising from the bank's issuance of a letter of credit. SeoulBank appeals following a jury verdict against it awarding $493,000. Lectrodryer cross-appeals, alleging demurrers were improperly sustained as to causes of action for fraud and intentional interference with contractual relations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases