The additional facts revealed by the complainant's testimony at trial would not warrant reopening of the Wade hearing, a remedy requested by defendant for the first time on appeal. The additional facts could not have changed the court's determination that the prompt showup was not unduly suggestive.
Defendant's challenge to the court's reasonable doubt instruction is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.