Contrary to defendant's attack on his criminal contempt conviction, we find that the order of protection provided defendant with fair notice of the conduct that was prohibited. Although the box alongside Paragraph B of the order was not checked, the complainant's name was inserted in the space following the language which provided that defendant would not threaten, annoy, harass or alarm such individual. Moreover, Paragraph A provided that defendant was to "stay away" from...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
