1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 97 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 97 Cal.Rptr.2d 842 (2000)
 

CATALANO v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. F034292.

97 Cal.Rptr.2d 842 (2000)

82 Cal.App.4th 91

Rose CATALANO, Individually and as Executor, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Fresno County, Respondent; David M. Camenson et al., Real Parties in Interest

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

Review Denied October 18, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce Albion Bailey, Burlingame, for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Robie & Matthai, Edith R. Matthai, Pamela E. Dunn, Gabrielle M. Jackson, Los Angeles, and Elizabeth E. Karnes, for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

VARTABEDIAN, Acting P.J.

It is settled, and not disputed by the parties, that a claim for punitive damages is one of the substantive areas which is properly the subject of a motion for summary adjudication. (DeCastro West Chodorow & Bums, Inc. v. Superior Court (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 410, 421, 54 Cal.Rptr.2d 792.) In this writ of mandate proceeding, we must answer a question of first impression...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases