The trial court properly precluded defendant from presenting evidence that a complainant in an unrelated robbery had misidentified defendant as her assailant where the proposed evidence did not show "a clear connection" between the perpetrator of the other robbery and the robberies with which defendant was charged "and raised no more than a mere suspicion" that another man who resembles defendant had committed the charged robberies (People v Coleman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. CROCKETT
275 A.D.2d 648 (2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 856
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES CROCKETT, Also Known as JAMES CROCKET, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 26, 2000.
Decided September 26, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.