Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The requirements of the fellow-officer rule were satisfied by the hearing evidence, since the observing officer testified that he observed defendant make a series of drug transactions and that he radioed a description of defendant and a direction to arrest him (see, People v Mims,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. AFFLIC
275 A.D.2d 647 (2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 326
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID AFFLIC, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 26, 2000.
Decided September 26, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.