¶ 1. DYKMAN, P.J.
The State appeals from an order granting John Thorstad's motion to suppress a warrantless blood test performed to obtain evidence of Thorstad's intoxication. The State contends that the blood test was admissible because Thorstad consented to the blood test, or in the alternative, because the blood test was justified under State v. Bohling,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.