1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 234 F.3d
  5. 234 F.3d 654 (2000)
 

RUIZ v. A.B. CHANCE CO.

Nos. 99-1557, 99-1563.

234 F.3d 654 (2000)

Richard RUIZ and Foundation Anchoring Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v. A.B. CHANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: December 6, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Michael Gardner, Dady & Garner, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Matthew A. Rosenberg, Herzog, Crebs & McGhee, LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for plaintiffs-cross appellants. With them on the brief was Mark R. Dunn, Herzog, Crebs & McGhee, LLP. Of counsel was Cheryl A. Stanton, Dady and Garner.

John H. Quinn, III, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Andrew B. Mayfield. Of counsel was Lisa M. Wood.

Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

The A.B. Chance Company ("Chance") appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri finding claims 1 through 4 and claims 6 through 8 of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,139,368 ("the '368 patent") and 5,171,107 ("the '107 patent") invalid for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (1999). On cross-appeal, Richard Ruiz and Foundation Anchoring Systems, Inc. (a/k/a "Fasteel") argue that the district court erred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases