1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 275 A.D.2d
  5. 275 A.D.2d 608 (2000)
 

DANIELS v. KROMO LENOX ASSOCIATES

275 A.D.2d 608 (2000)

712 N.Y.S.2d 862

SEAN DANIELS, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, LINDA DANIELS, Appellant, v. KROMO LENOX ASSOCIATES et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided September 7, 2000.

In view of the liberality we employ when entertaining motions to amend pleadings (CPLR 3025 [b]), which "should be granted freely if the proponent has alleged facts to establish a prima facie cause of action unless the party opposing amendment has demonstrated that those alleged facts would be insufficient as a matter of law" (Tapps of Nassau Supermarkets v Linden Blvd., 269 A.D.2d 306, 308), and of the presence of at least some...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases