Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the plaintiffs failed to establish prima facie that the plaintiff Dawnett Mitchell sustained a "serious injury" as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The only medical testimony offered at trial was that of a chiropractor. Although the chiropractor testified to the degree of limitation in range of motion of the plaintiff's neck, he did not testify to the objective tests...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
