1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 235 F.3d
  5. 235 F.3d 522 (2000)
 

DODOO v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

No. 99-6352.

235 F.3d 522 (2000)

Branford DODOO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

December 15, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary C. Pierson (Sam R. Fulkerson, Scott A. Briggs, with him on the briefs) of McAfee & Taft, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Defendant-Appellant.

Emmanuel E. Edem of Norman, Edem, McNaughton & Wallace, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before BALDOCK and McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SHADUR, District Judge.

SHADUR, District Judge.

Branford Dodoo ("Dodoo") sued Seagate Technology, Inc. ("Seagate"), charging that Seagate's denial of his applications for promotion to no fewer than nine different jobs during 1997 stemmed from several types of discrimination — discrimination based on his age, race and national origin — in violation of state and federal law. Before trial the district court granted summary judgment for Seagate on a host of Dodoo's claims: on all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases