Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court correctly determined that the testimony of numerous witnesses at the hearing demonstrates many instances of fraud in the obtaining of signatures for the designating petition. In light of the candidate's role in the gathering of such signatures, the petition was permeated with fraud and was properly invalidated (see, Matter of Saitta v Rivera,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.