1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 615 N.W.2d
  5. 615 N.W.2d 76 (2000)
 

DEALERS MFG., CO. v. COUNTY OF ANOKA

No. C9-99-1869.

615 N.W.2d 76 (2000)

DEALERS MANUFACTURING, CO., Respondent, v. COUNTY OF ANOKA, Relator.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 10, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G. Haluska, Assistant Anoka County Attorney, Anoka, for appellant.

Daniel J. Biersdorf, Biersdorf & Associates, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Thomas R. Wilhelmy, Steven Z. Kaplan, Fredrickson & Bryon, Minneapolis, for amicus curiae.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

We consider whether a taxpayer challenging a property tax assessment is entitled to a reduction in the assessed value of contaminated property based on stigma. Taxpayer, Dealers Manufacturing, Co. (Dealers), petitioned the tax court for a reduction in the assessment of its contaminated property in Anoka County (the county) on the basis that, because the county failed to take into account the stigma effect on the market value of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases