SOUTHWESTERN BELL TEL. v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N

No. 98-50787.

208 F.3d 475 (2000)

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS; Pat Wood III; Judy Walsh; Brett Pearlman; Time Warner Communications of Austin, L.P.; Time Warner Communications of Houston, L.P.; and Fibrcom, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 30, 2000


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Hearon, Jr. Michael Lee Diehl, Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody, Austin, TX, Sean Abram Lev, Michael K. Kellogg (argued), Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd & Evans, Washington, DC, Melanie S. Fannin, Ann E. Meuleman, Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Amanda Atkinson Cagle, Natural Resources Div., Austin, TX, for Public Utility Com'n of Texas Pat Wood, III, Judy Walsh and Brett Pearlman.

Diane M. Barlow (argued), Valerie Patriarca Kirk, Casey, Gentz & Sifuentes, Austin, TX, for Time Warner Communications of Austin, L.P., Time Warner Communications of Houston, L.P. and Fibrcom Inc.

Darryl M. Bradford, John J. Hamill, Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, for MCI Worldcom, Amicus Curiae.

Michael L. Shor, Richard M. Rindler, Swidler, Berlin, Shereff, Friedman, Washington, DC, for ICG Choicecom LP and GST Texas Lightwave Inc., Amicus Curiae.

Mark Witcher, Austin, TX, for Teleport Communications Group, Inc., Amicus Curiae.

Before WIENER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.


WIENER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves a dispute between two interconnecting telephone companies ("carriers") in the same local calling areas about whether modem calls placed by local customers of one carrier to the Internet Service Provider ("ISP") customers of another carrier should be charged for as a "local" call. The contracts between the carriers that are parties to this appeal specify that local calls placed by customers of one carrier to customers of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases