U.S. v. NAPIER

No. 00-5290.

233 F.3d 394 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harvey Lloyd NAPIER, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: November 21, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Arehart (argued), Charles P. Wisdom, Jr. (briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Lexington, KY, Martin L. Hatfield (briefed), Assistant U.S. Attorney London, KY, for Appellee.

Robert I. Cusick, Jr. (argued and briefed), Pamela J. Ledford (briefed), Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, Louisville, KY, Warren N. Scoville (briefed), Scoville, Cessna & Associates, London, KY, for Appellant.

Before: MERRITT and GILMAN, Circuit Judges; BELL, District Judge.


Decided and Filed: November 21, 2000. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

OPINION

BELL, District Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Harvey Lloyd Napier appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) for possession of firearms while subject to a domestic violence order. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM Napier's conviction.

I.

The essential facts are not in dispute.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases