1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 84 F.Supp.2d
  5. 84 F.Supp.2d 452 (2000)
 

S.E.C. v. PRINCETON ECONOMIC INTERN. LTD.

Nos. 99 Civ. 9667, 99 Civ. 9669.

84 F.Supp.2d 452 (2000)

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. PRINCETON ECONOMIC INTERNATIONAL LTD., Princeton Global Management Ltd. and Martin A. Armstrong, Defendants. Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Plaintiff, v. Princeton Economic International Ltd., Princeton Global Management Ltd. and Martin A. Armstrong, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 16, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Securities and Exchange Commission, Carmen J. Lawrence, Eric M. Schmidt, Edwin H. Nordlinger, Helene Glotzer, David Rosenfeld, New York, NY, for S.E.C.

Tenzer Greenblatt LLP, Martin P. Unger, Lawrence S. Feld, Lawrence M. Rosenstock, Niral P. Kalaria, New York, NY, for defendant Martin A. Armstrong.

OPINION AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

The complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") alleges that Martin A. Armstrong, and his companies, Princeton Economic International Ltd. ("PEIL"), Princeton Global Management Ltd. ("PGML"), and numerous subsidiaries and affiliates, violated section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 77g(a), and section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases