U.S. v. BUCHANAN

Nos. 98-1353, 98-1391, 98-1533, 98-1534, 98-1535, 98-1537, 98-1538, 98-1590, 98-1594, 98-1780.

213 F.3d 302 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allie Richard BUCHANAN IV (98-1353), Troy Swindle (98-1780), Albert Derring (98-1391), Derrick C. Flowers (98-1594), Charles Washpun (98-1590), Rodney D. Atkinson (98-1538), Otis Murray III (98-1537), Eurtis Jones (98-1535), George Kellum (98-1534), and Darryl Ford (98-1533), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: February 17, 2000.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied May 16, 2000.

As Corrected on Denial of Rehearing May 22, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barbara Colby Tanase (briefed), Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, Glenn Martin, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Lansing, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee in No. 98-1353.

Barbara Colby Tanase (briefed), Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee in No. 98-1391.

Barbara Colby Tanase (argued and briefed), Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, Glenn Martin, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Lansing, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee in Nos. 98-1533, 98-1534, 98-1535, 98-1537, 98-1538, 98-159098-1594, and 98-1780.

Craig T. Wormley (briefed), Miller & Associates, Santa Monica, CA, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 98-1353.

Albert Derring, pro se, in No. 98-1391.

David W. Garrett (argued and briefed), David W. Garrett and Associates, Comstock Park, MI, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 98-1533.

Darryl Ford, pro se, in No. 98-1533.

Gaylor L. Cardinal (argued and briefed), Sluiter, Agents, Cardinal, Van Gessel, Winther & Carlson, Wyoming, MI, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 98-1534.

William Mitchell, III (argued and briefed), Sherbow & Mitchell, Troy, MI, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 98-1535.

Kenneth A. Rathert (argued and briefed), Rathert Law Offices, Kalamazoo, MI, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 98-1537.

John R. Minock (argued and briefed), Cramer, Minock & Gallagher, Ann Arbor, MI, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 98-1538.

Charles Washpun, pro se, in No. 98-1590.

Stuart G. Friedman (argued and briefed), Ann Arbor, MI, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 98-1590.

Maureen M. Milliron (argued and briefed), Sherbow & Mitchell, Troy, MI, for Defendant-Appellant in 98-1594.

Troy Swindle, pro se, in No. 98-1780.

C. Mark Pickrell (briefed), Nashville, TN, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 98-1780.

Before: JONES, MOORE, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied in No. 98-1533 May 16, 2000.

GILMAN, J., announced the judgment of the court and, with one exception, delivered the opinion of the court. MOORE, J., concurred in the opinion except as to Part II.C.3 (the drug dog issue). JONES, J. (pp. 315-18), delivered a separate opinion in which he concurred in the above opinion except as to Parts II.C.3 and II.C.5 (the photo issue). MOORE, J., joined in this opinion only as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases