AEROTEL, LTD. v. RSL COMMUNICATIONS, LTD.

No. 99 CIV. 10398 SAS.

99 F.Supp.2d 368 (2000)

AEROTEL, LTD. and Aerotel, U.S.A., Inc., Plaintiffs, v. RSL COMMUNICATIONS, LTD., Deltathree.com, Inc., and RSL Com Primecall, Inc., Defendants, and RSL Com U.S.A., Inc., Additional Counterclaim Plaintiff, RSL Communications, Ltd., Deltathree.com, Inc., and RSL Com Primecall, Inc., Third Party Plaintiffs, and RSL com U.S.A., Inc., Additional Third Party Plaintiff, v. NACT Telecommunications, Inc., Third Party Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 19, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan Young, Andrew B. Messite, Reed Smith Shaw & McClay LLP, New York City, for Third Party Plaintiffs.

Harry Frischer, Emily Stern, Solomon, Zauderer, Ellenhorn, Frischer & Sharp, New York City, Robert A. Bartlett, J. Michael Levengood, Nicole M. Imamshah, Long Aldridge & Norman LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Third Party Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Aerotel, Ltd. and Aerotel U.S.A., Inc. (collectively "Aerotel") have sued RSL Communications, Ltd. ("RSL Ltd."), Deltathree.com, Inc., and RSL Com Primecall, Inc. ("Primecall") (collectively "RSL") for infringing its U.S. Patent Number 4,706,275 (the "275 Patent") through the use of certain prepaid calling card equipment and software (the "NACT System") purchased from NACT Telecommunications...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases