JOHNSON v. ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC.

No. 98-0445.

238 Wis.2d 227 (2000)

2000 WI App 166

616 N.W.2d 903

Charles JOHNSON and Karen Johnson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., Heartland Counseling Services, Defendants-Respondents, SOUTH STREET CLINIC, Defendant, Kay PHILLIPS, Ph.D., Jeff Hollowell and Tim Reisenauer, Defendants-Respondents, ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, DEF Insurance Company, GHI Insurance Company, JKL Insurance Company, MNO Insurance Company, and PQR Insurance Company, Defendants, WISCONSIN PATIENTS COMPENSATION FUND, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided July 13, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of William Smoler and Gregory P. Seibold of Murphy & Desmond, S.C. of Madison.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc., the cause was submitted on the brief of Lori Gendelman and Jeffrey J.P. Conta of Otjen, Van Ert, Lieb & Weir, S.C. of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, Kay Phillips, Ph.D., the cause was submitted on the brief of David E. McFarlane and Kendall Harrison of La Follette Sinykin, LLP of Madison.

On behalf of the defendants-respondents, Jeff Hollowell and Tim Reisenauer, the cause was submitted on the brief of Bradway A. Liddle, Jr. and Mario D. Mendoza of Boardman, Suhr, Curry & Field LLP of Madison.

Before Dykman, P.J., Roggensack and Deininger, JJ.


¶ 1. ROGGENSACK, J.

Charles and Karen Johnson (the Johnsons) brought suit for personal injuries they contend they suffered due to false allegations by their daughter, Charlotte, that when she was a child, Charles had sexually abused her and Karen had physically abused her. The Johnsons contend they have a third-party claim for medical malpractice due to the negligent infliction of emotional harm to them, under the holding of Sawyer v. Midelfort,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases