1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 264 A.D.2d
  5. 264 A.D.2d 105 (2000)
 

PEOPLE v. FRASER

264 A.D.2d 105 (2000)

704 N.Y.S.2d 426

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PAUL FRASER, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

February 16, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Arcuri, District Attorney of Oneida County, Utica (Michael A. Colluzza of counsel), for respondent.

Mark A. Wolber, Utica, for appellant.

HAYES, J. P., WISNER, SCUDDER and LAWTON, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PIGOTT, JR., J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of two counts of possessing a sexual performance by a child (Penal Law § 263.16). Defendant contends that a visual image stored in a computer hard drive is not a "photograph" within the meaning of Penal Law § 263.00 (4), and that County Court erred in denying his requests to charge the affirmative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases