1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 228 F.3d
  5. 228 F.3d 135 (2000)
 

TUNICK v. SAFIR

Docket No. 99-7823

228 F.3d 135 (2000)

Spencer TUNICK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Howard SAFIR, in his official capacity as the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and the City of New York, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided May 19, 2000.

Further Concurrence and Dissent Decided July 11, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald L. Kuby, New York, NY (Daniel M. Perez, Law Offices of Ronald L. Kuby; Arthur Eisenberg, Norman Siegel, Christopher Dunn, New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, on the brief), for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Stephen J. McGrath, Deputy Chief Appeals Division, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY (Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, Leonard Koerner, Alan Beckoff, of counsel, on the brief), for Defendants-Appellants.

Before: VAN GRAAFEILAND, CALABRESI, and SACK, Circuit Judges.

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge, concurs.

SACK, Circuit Judge, concurs.

VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge, dissents.

PER CURIAM:

On July 13, 1999, the plaintiff Spencer Tunick filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York seeking an injunction preventing the City of New York and its Police Commissioner, Howard Safir, (collectively, the "City") from interfering with a "photo shoot" that Tunick proposed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases