1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 231 F.3d
  5. 231 F.3d 82 (2000)
 

CONOPCO, INC. v. ROLL INTERN.

Docket No. 00-7012.

231 F.3d 82 (2000)

CONOPCO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROLL INTERNATIONAL and Paramount Farms, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. August Term, 1999.

Decided: November 3, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Serio, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Thomas C. Sheehan, of counsel), for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Andrew S. Clare, Loeb & Loeb, LLP, Los Angeles, CA (Lawrence B. Gutcho, of counsel, P. Gregory Schwed and Maria L. Zanfini, Loeb & Loeb, New York, NY, of counsel, Hillel Chodos, Los Angeles, CA, of counsel), for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: McLAUGHLIN, PARKER, Circuit Judges, and DORSEY, District Judge.

Judge DORSEY dissents in a separate opinion.

BACKGROUND

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:

This civil procedure morass arises from the sale by Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Lipton ("Conopco") of its Sunkist brand fruit roll snack business to Roll International Corporation ("Roll") and Roll's wholly-owned subsidiary Paramount Farms, Inc. ("Paramount"). Under a purchase agreement signed in June 1995 (the "Purchase Agreement"), Conopco agreed to transfer its existing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases