STATE v. ARNETT

No. 99-468.

88 Ohio St.3d 208 (2000)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. ARNETT, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 15, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, James Michael Keeling, Ronald Springman and Philip R. Cummings, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant.

Charles H. Bartlett, Jr., for appellee.

Mark B. Greenlee, pro se, urging reversal as amicus curiae.

Abby R. Levine, ACLU Cooperating Attorney, urging affirmance for amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation, Inc.


COOK, J.

This case asks whether the sentencing judge violated the statutory requirements of the Revised Code or the constitutional dictates of due process when she acknowledged referring to the Bible during her deliberations, and then quoted a biblical passage on the record at the sentencing proceeding. Because we determine that the trial court complied with the applicable provisions of R.C. Chapter 2929 and that the judge's reference to the Bible did not impair the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases