RICE v. CROW

No. B130074.

97 Cal.Rptr.2d 110 (2000)

81 Cal.App.4th 725

Harvey RICE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Robert Trammell CROW et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

Review Denied September 13, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burgee & Abramoff and John G. Burgee, Encino, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Dimascio & Berardo and Dianne Dimascio, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents Robert T. Crow, Robert Rickard and Ronald Cox.

Sandler and Rosen and Charles L. Birke, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Neal Pardee.


MALLANO, J.*

Plaintiff Harvey Rice (Rice) appeals from a summary judgment granted against him and in favor of Robert Crow (Crow), Neal Pardee (Pardee), Robert Rickard (Rickard) and Ronald Cox (Cox) (collectively Defendants). Relying on the decision in Arciniega v. Bank of San Bernardino (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 213, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 495 (

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases