PER CURIAM.
We conclude that the University's final order is supported by competent substantial evidence and that the hearing panel did not err in excluding the appellant's proffer of polygraph evidence and similar fact evidence. Accordingly, we affirm.
MINER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR. WOLF, J., DISSENTS WITH OPINION.
WOLF, J., dissenting.
I believe that the similar-fact evidence which appellant attempted to introduce should have been considered...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.