PER CURIAM.
Appellant claims that the trial court fundamentally erred both in failing to instruct the jury on his defense when it excluded from the justifiable use of force jury instruction that portion dealing with defense of property, and in giving the self-defense by an aggressor portion of the justifiable use of non-deadly force instruction. As to the former, no evidence was presented to warrant the instruction, as appellant himself testified that he feared injury...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
