PEOPLE v. HATCH

No. S074630.

92 Cal.Rptr.2d 80 (2000)

22 Cal.4th 260

991 P.2d 165

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Daniel William HATCH, Defendant and Respondent. In re Daniel William Hatch, on Habeas Corpus.

Supreme Court of California.

January 31, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gil Garcetti, District Attorney, George M. Palmer, Patrick D. Moran, Brent Riggs and Diana L. Summerhayes, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John J. Reed, Tustin, and Eliseo D.W. Gauna, Van Nuys, for Defendant and Respondent.


BROWN, J.

The primary issue before us is whether the constitutional prohibitions against double jeopardy bar retrial after a dismissal under section 1385 of the Penal Code.1 We conclude they do not under the facts of this case.

Factual And Procedural Background

Defendant Daniel William Hatch was originally charged by information with seven sex offenses: (1) two counts of forcible penetration by a foreign object (§...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases