VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGIES v. TITAN WHEEL INTERN.

No. 99-1042.

212 F.3d 1377 (2000)

VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TITAN WHEEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Dyneer Corporation, Transamerica Auto Parts Company, Inc., and Leon Rosser Auto Service, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 22, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Killworth, Killworth, Gottman, Hagan & Schaeff, L.L.P., of Dayton, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief were Ronald L. Johnston, James R. Farrand, and James S. Blackburn, Blanc Williams Johnston & Kronstadt, LLP, of Los Angeles, California.

Kent A. Herink, Davis, Brown, Koehn, Shors, & Roberts, P.C., of Des Moines, Iowa, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Patricia L. Ades.

Before PLAGER, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the court filed PER CURIAM. Circuit Judge RADER concurs.

PER CURIAM.

The United States District Court for the Central District of California granted the motion of Titan Wheel International, Inc., Dyneer Corp., Transamerica Auto Parts Co., Inc., and Leon Rosser Auto Service, Inc. (collectively Tractech) for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,413,015 (the '015 patent), assigned to Vehicular Technologies Corporation (PowerTrax...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases