1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 212 F.3d
  5. 212 F.3d 1365 (2000)
 

RIVERWOOD INTERN. CORP. v. MEAD CORP.

No. 99-1274.

212 F.3d 1365 (2000)

RIVERWOOD INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE MEAD CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied June 22, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wellington M. Manning, Jr., Dority & Manning, P.A., of Greenville, South Carolina, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Neil C. Jones and Craig N. Killen.

J. Peter Coll, Jr., Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were James J. Murtha and Kristen Bancroft. Of counsel on the brief were Robert T. Edell and Robert J. Glance, Merchant & Gould, of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, SCHALL and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 22, 2000.

MAYER, Chief Judge.

The Mead Corporation ("Mead") appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, holding that Mead infringed claims 1 and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 5,241,806 ("the '806 patent") owned by Riverwood International Corporation ("Riverwood") and that these claims were not invalid for obviousness. See Riverwood Int'l Corp. v. Mead Corp.,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases