GULF POWER COMPANY, Alabama Power Company, et al., Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents.
Tampa Electric Company, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
Florida Power & Light Company, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
Commonwealth Edison Company, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
Potomac Electric Power Company, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
Texas Utilities Electric Company, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
Union Electric Company, d.b.a. Amerenue, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
American Electric Power Services Corporation, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
Duke Energy Corporation, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
Virginia Electric and Power Company, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
Carolina Power & Light Company, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
Duquesne Light Company, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
Duquesne Light Company, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 12, 2000.
September 12, 2000.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
David W. Carpenter, Sidley & Austin, Washington, DC, for AT&T Corp.
James T. Hannon, U.S. West, Inc., Denver, CO, for U.S. West, Inc.
Walter Steimel, Jr., Greenberg Traurig, Washington, DC, for Gulf Power Co., Alabama Power Co., Georgia Power Co., Southern Co. Services, Inc., Tampa Elec. Co., Potomac Elec. Power Co., Virginia Elec. and Power Co., Carolina Power & Light Co., Duquesne Light Co., and Delmarva Power & Light Co.
Matthew J. Calvert, Hunton & Williams, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioners in 98-6222, Tampa Elec. Co. and Florida Power & Light Co.
John Francis Raposa, GTE Serv. Corp., Irvin, TX, for Intervenor GTE Serv. Corp.
Robert B. McKenna, U.S. West, Inc., Washington, DC, for Intervenor, U.S. West, Inc.
William Single, Washington, DC, Paul Glist, Geoffrey Charles Cook, Cole, Raywid & Braverman, John D. Thomas, Washington, DC, Marjorie K. Conner, Hunton & Williams, Washington, DC, for Intervenors in 98-6222.
Jean Howard, Miami, FL, for Gulf Power and Florida Power & Light Co.
Michael S. Schooler, Nat. Cable Television Ass'n, Washington, DC, for Intervenor, Nat. Cable Television Ass'n.
Gregory M. Christophewr, FCC, Robert B. Nicholson, Robert J. Wiggers, U.S. Dept. of Justice/Antitrust Div., Richard Bruce Beckner, Fleischman & Walsh, LLP, Janet Reno, U.S. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, Steven D. Strickland, SBC Communications, Inc., San Antonio, TX, Marjorie K. Conner, Hunton, & Williams, Washington, DC, for FCC and U.S.
Jean G. Howard, Florida Power & Light Co., Miami, FL, for Florida Power & Light Co.
Thomas Peter Steindler, Christine M. Gill, Shirley Sachie Fujimoto, McDermott, Will & Emery, Washington, DC, for Houston Lighting and Power Co., Public Serv. Elec. & Gas, Amerite, Commonwealth Edison Co., Union Elec. Co., American Elec. Power Serv. Corp. and Duke Energy Corp.
Wayne Kenneth Ferree, Jonathan L. Wiener, Goldberg, Godles, Wiener & Wright, Washington, DC, for Texas Utilities Elec. Co.
Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion April 11, 2000, 11th Cir., 2000, 208 F.3d 1263)
PER CURIAM:
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
