1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 613 N.W.2d
  5. 613 N.W.2d 804 (2000)
 

PECINOVSKY v. AMCO INS. CO.

No. C6-00-7.

613 N.W.2d 804 (2000)

Christopher PECINOVSKY and Lorraine Pecinovsky, individually and as parents and natural guardians of Sara Pecinovsky, a minor, Respondents, v. AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 18, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond L. Hansen, O'Brien, Ehrick, Wolf, Deaner & Maus, L.L.P., Rochester, for respondents.

George C. Hottinger, Paul D. Reuvers, Erstad & Riemer, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, Presiding Judge, LANSING, Judge, and HALBROOKS, Judge.

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge

Respondents commenced this declaratory-judgment action seeking to stack personal-injury protection benefits available under their automobile-insurance policy. Respondents contend that stacking should occur by operation of law because appellant did not offer the stacking option as required by Minn.Stat. § 65B.47, subd. 7 (1998). A jury concluded that appellant failed to offer stacking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases