1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 792 A.2d
  5. 792 A.2d 572 (2000)
 

STOCHEL v. PLANNING BD. OF EDISON TWP.

792 A.2d 572 (2000)

348 N.J. Super. 636

Walter R. STOCHEL, Jr., Jane Tousman, Robert Spiegel, Ken Chang and John Shersick, Plaintiffs, v. PLANNING BOARD OF EDISON TOWNSHIP, Defendant, and JSM at New Dover, L.L.C., Defendant/Intervenor.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Following Remand December 4, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart J. Lieberman, Princeton, for plaintiffs (Leiberman & Blecher, P.C., attorneys).

Clifford Kuhn, Jr., Edison, for defendant.

Stephen E. Barcan, Woodbridge, for defendant-intervenor (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys) (Mr. Barcan and Donna M. Jennings, on the brief).

WOLFSON, J.S.C.

I. Introductory Statement

This zoning case requires me to analyze certain vexing questions associated with "accessory" uses that have not yet been squarely addressed by any appellate authority. The specific determination in this case, the circumstances under which a given component of a proposed development will qualify as "accessory," not only implicates jurisdictional issues under the Municipal Land Use Law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases