Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that County Court erred in sentencing him as a second felony offender without conducting a hearing to determine whether, as a result of the tolling provision set forth in Penal Law § 70.06 (1) (b) (v), defendant's prior felony conviction was within the 10-year period set forth in Penal Law § 70.06 (1) (b) (iv). That contention is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
